The Robert Paisola Foundation Salt Lake County Jail Booking Live Feed

The Robert Paisola Live World News Feed

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Are You Being Charged with Possession of Child Porn... Lets Talk,, By Robert Paisola 2015

October 25, 2014 at 5:27am
THIS IS MY STORY:  After nearly 20 years, it is time to GIVE BACK!

By: Robert Paisola

Robert Paisola for Maxim Magazine 2015
Looking back on a 20 year journey that changed my life.  The mistakes I made can never be undone, however being able to ADMIT to the past problems and deal with the here and now will put you on a road to success that you never imagined.  20 years ago I naively viewed child porn.  I paid a harsh price, and now I dedicate every day to helping others.  I am one of the lucky ones.  I have recovered both emotionally and financially and now am able to assist those in similar situations.  If you find yourself reading this and you have been charged with the crime of Possession of Child Porn, email me your story at and I guarantee that My ability to work with you will change your life.  Think of me as your consultant, for hire, to get you through this difficult process.   I used to fear when people would google " Robert Paisola Child Porn " but now I am able to assist so many people.  You will not find me on one single government database in the nation.  I can assist you with doing the same. That is what I do. You do not have to go through this alone.  That is why I am writing this article that will be published nationally.  Yes, I know the system. Yes, I know what you are going through and DO NOT pay an attorney a penny until we talk.  Be sure to read "The Robert Paisola Story" below and then join me on Facebook at   This is WHY I started my foundation.

I know a guy who cheats on his wife. He cheats on her every day. He cheats on her multiple times a day. He’s a husband and a father and a serial adulterer.

I shouldn't know this fact about him, but it came up in conversation a few days ago. We were talking about the divorce rate; both of us gave our theories as to why the statistics are so high. I mentioned in my diagnosis a few studies that show pornography to be a root cause in over 50 percent of divorces annually.

He laughed. “People don’t get divorced over porn.” He went on to explain that porn isn't a “big deal” to most people. It’s not “like it’s cheating or something.” He told me that he looks at it multiple times daily. His wife, he insisted, might be a little peeved if she knew the extent of it, but only because women overreact about “that kind of thing.”

What kind of thing? Their husbands spending all day obsessively plunging through the darkest regions of the internet for graphic sexual images of rape, abuse, perversion, exploitation and other forms of filthy depravity previously unknown to mankind?

Yeah. That kind of thing. No reason why any wife should be too upset about that, apparently.

Listen guys, I know this is an uncomfortable conversation. But it’s time we man up and get real about pornography. First things first: if you’re married and you look at porn, you are cheating. Period. From a Christian perspective, this can’t be debated. Christ laid it out very clearly: if you lust after another woman, you have committed adultery. When we look at porn we are choosing to succumb to that lust; we are indulging it, fertilizing it, giving it respite in our minds. We are diving into it headfirst and soaking in it like a sponge. We are lessening ourselves, betraying our wives and girlfriends and participating in the violent exploitation of women (and girls). Or minds and our bodies belong to the Lord and to our wives; pornography, therefore, intrudes on their domain. If we look at porn, we are adulterers. We are adulterers in all the worst ways.

We don’t even need to refer to Scripture to figure out the simple equation that porn equals adultery.

Why wouldn't it?

Because you aren't physically in contact with another woman?

So what? That’s merely a matter of semantics and circumstance. The absence of physical touch doesn’t automatically free you of the scarlet letter — if it did, ‘sexting’ with other women would be fair game, I suppose. How would you feel if you looked through your wife’s phone and found racy, sexually graphic text messages she’d sent to a man at her office? Would you be alright with it as long as she could prove she never had any physical contact with him? Or is that totally different because she knows the guy, whereas porn is anonymous and impersonal? See, we find ourselves constructing many arbitrary lines of distinction when we are determined to rationalize behavior we instinctively know to be immoral and wrong.

But, OK, what if she didn’t know the guy? What if she was engaging in “fantasies” with men she never met? Imagine that, in your cyber travels, you stumbled upon a porn site featuring pictures and videos of a particularly alluring young female: your wife. How would that sit with you? Your wife selling digital sex all over the internet — how would you like that? It might cause a bit of a marital dispute, wouldn't you say?
If you wouldn't want your wife being a porn provider, you ought to understand why she wouldn't want you to be a porn consumer. If you wouldn't want her to invite and encourage other men to violate her in their minds, you ought to understand why she wouldn't want you to accept the invitation to violate other women in yours.

I don’t mean to concentrate only on married men. Porn is poison for everyone, married or not. And I’m not here to castigate you if you've stumbled. We live in a society that preys upon a man’s weaknesses, shoving sex into his face at hyper speed every day, all day, all of the time. This is not excuse; just an attempt to put things into context. I won’t yell at a guy who fights a porn addiction anymore than I’d yell at a guy who fights a crack addiction. But at least the crack addict likely won’t encounter very many people (besides his dealer) who will tell him that it’s actually healthy to smoke crack. If he ventures outside of the abandoned shack where he scores his dope, he probably won’t find any respectable people who will say, “hey, crack is not a big deal — it’s totally natural to smoke crack, man!” In that way, the crack smoker has a leg up on the porn addict. The porn addict, by contrast, has to fight both the compulsion itself and the myriad of creeps who will try to convince him that it’s all just a bit of innocent fun.
That’s a lie, of course. It’s not innocent. It’s not fun.

I could cite for you the mounds of psychiatric research proving the detrimental effects of pornography on the brain. But you can do that research yourself.

I could tell you about sex slavery, human trafficking, drug abuse, and child molestation, and I could explain how the porn industry wouldn't exist without these necessary ingredients. I dove into this subject because I wanted to learn more; yo understand what went wrong in my life 20 years ago.

But these are conclusions you can draw on your own, if ever you take even a moment to think about it.

I could remind you that these women you find on your porn sites might not be women at all — they could be children — and there’s no way for you to know for sure. I could then point out that any avid porn customer has most likely at some point been a child porn customer, whether he knew it or not. But this is, indeed, an obvious and inescapable reality.  And this is shocking but true.

I could tell you that many children view graphic porn for the first time before the age of 12. I could tell you that we haven’t even begun to reap the atrocious fruits that will come from an entire generation raised on the heinous perversions of internet pornography. But it’s probably too late for these warnings.

So what is left? Perhaps nothing, really. Pornography is evil, empty, deadening, dirty — this is something we all know. That’s why, unless you are either psychotic or utterly despicable, you wouldn’t want your daughter to get into the porn business. That’s why most people hide their porn habits. That’s why it still isn’t considered acceptable to browse “adult” websites at your desk at work or at a table in Starbucks (although people still do, in both scenarios). That’s why you only find porn shops and strip clubs in the slummy, rundown parts of town. No matter how hedonistic and “open minded” we become, we still recognize porn as something that ought to be stowed away in the dank, dark corners of our lives. This is Natural Law, and we can’t escape it. We have an innate understanding of right and wrong, whether we want it or not.

Married men: I think we should be spending our free time with our families, or reading interesting books so that we can sharpen our minds, or building things, or exercising, or doing anything else that will make us better men. Porn will not make you a better man. It will make you smaller. It will make you a liar. It will kill that instinct inside you that calls you to protect and honor women. It will turn you into something you never wanted to be. It will turn you into a sneaky, shameful pervert.  Guys in relationships... it is the same for you

The bottom line is that I crossed the line and no matter how naive or stupid I was "as a kid" , I was held accountable.  Do the right thing and do your own research and if not for yourself, do it for the ones you love.  And no matter what, if you are in this position, read the links below and get in touch ASAP!  My personal cell phone is 702-219-3624 (As of November 2014)

Just A Thought
Robert Paisola, Las Vegas Nevada
for Maxim Magazine 2015  

If you want to learn more about my experience with this deadly problem, Read THE ROBERT PAISOLA STORY at:

Many people think that child pornography cases involving the distribution, receipt, or possession of child pornography are not that serious because these offenses do not involve an actual victim.   Whereas the production of child pornography usually involves the use of actual children, the possession and distribution of child pornography do not.  Most people don't realize the serious ramifications of these “sex crimes.”  Even looking at or possessing on your computer or other electronic device a few photographs is a very serious crime that can carry a minimum of five years in prison in the case of a Federal Child Pornography case.
The federal code section for this offense is 18 U.S.C. 2252.
These cases are very serious even in state court today.  Many counties in the state of California, for instance San Francisco and Alameda Counties, used to routinely charge these crimes as misdemeanors that carried very little jail time, if any.  While a violation of California Penal Code section 311.11 (Possession of Child Pornography) and related charges were clearly viewed as less serious, they did (and do) still carry lifetime Sex Offender Registration pursuant to California Penal Code section 290.  Thus, it is essential that when someone is informed that there is an active investigation into the possession of child pornography, distribution of child pornography or any other related offense, they immediately obtain the services of an experienced and skilled criminal defense attorney who specializes in dealing with Possession of Child Pornography and Distribution of Child Pornography cases.
If you have been informed of such an investigation or that Child Pornography charges have been filed, we recommend that you call us immediately  


The department of justice reports a 2,500 percent increase in child pornography-related arrests over the last 10 years. While there are many factors that draw everyday people to child pornography, the technological advances of the internet and the proliferation of Peer to Peer (P2P) networks have made it very easy to obtain and share or distribute child pornography, sometimes without even knowing it is happening. Anyone with a computer connected to the internet can obtain an unlimited amount of illegal images or videos with the click of a mouse.
The federal government in particular, not to mention various State of California Task Forces, are stepping up their investigations by actively conducting sting operations, pro-actively posing on or infiltrating internet chat rooms, tracking IP addresses and investigating file sharing networks. We have seen a huge proliferation of child pornography cases in Federal Court and throughout California and the United States.  Along with this, the Federal Courts have imposed a significant increase in the length of prison sentences for federal defendants convicted of these types of sex offenses.


typical child pornography investigation within a file sharing network involves the Police or FBI signing on to a P2P network, either under a fake username or by using an existing user's credentials. Once on the network, the police will browse the network and search for incriminating files.
When a P2P user downloads a file, the program places it into a “shared” folder. In addition, the user can add additional files from his or her personal collection into this shared folder so that others may gain access.  Some P2P programs allow users to configure their shared folders in order to restrict what files to share and with whom. However, the FBI has developed a program called “EP2P” which allows it to see all of a user's shared files, and may even have the ability to change the shared file's settings. Suffice it to say that the government has very sophisticated methods of identifying and locating child pornography despite any precautions an individual may take.
When the FBI has identified suspected child pornography inside another user's shared folder, it will use another program to identify and track that user's IP address. All IP addresses are correlated with a physical location through an Internet Service Provider (ISP), for example AT&T.  Once the IP address is obtained, they will subpoena the ISP for the owner's personal information and physical location of that IP address and obtain a search warrant to search that location.  The search warrant will often include a command to search for any computer equipment, electronic media, personal papers and documents, indicia establishing that the person lives at or has access to that premises and of course any evidence of illegal material such as photos, videos, magazines or other hard copy of child pornography.


1. Assert your rights.

If the FBI or police come to your door, there are two phrases you should repeat over and over: “I want an attorney” and “you do not have permission to search.” It is very important to remain silent except for the two phrases above. Do not engage in small talk or try to explain anything away. Undoubtedly, the FBI or police will try to get you to change your mind and speak with them. The Supreme Court has said that under certain circumstances investigators may even lie to you to induce you to admit you committed a crime.  You must resist their tactics, whether you are innocent or guilty.  If the FBI or police have a warrant, do not obstruct them but then again never consent to anything either. Remember that they are there for the sole purpose of making their case and establishing your guilt, so anything you do or say will be used against you.  Their goal is to build a case and to see that you are convicted and put in prison.
If the FBI is not at your door or you have not yet been arrested, but you have reason to believe you are under investigation, you should still immediately obtain legal representation from an experienced and skilled lawyer who specializes in Possession and Distribution of Child Pornography cases.  Your attorney can evaluate your case and then recommend your best course of action, whether you should cooperate with the government, to what degree, and in many cases help you avoid criminal charges before they are filed.

2. Deleting files.

Many people believe that hitting the delete button on their computer makes a file disappear forever. Some might therefore think that viewing child pornography and immediately deleting those files, internet histories, logs, and cookies will cover up any evidence of wrong-doing. In fact, deleting a file only sends it to another part of a computer's hard drive where it is stored indefinitely until it is over-written by another file. The government possesses very sophisticated computer forensic software that can recover files long after they have been deleted.

3. Get the help you need from an experienced and highly skilled lawyer.

Whether you are completely innocent or have actually viewed, possessed, distributed or even produced child pornography, it is essential that you retain the services of a highly experienced and skilled lawyer who specializes in the area of possession and distribution of child pornography or related charges.  Furthermore, you must fully apprise your attorney of all relevant information related to your case so that he can fully defend you.  The FBI and other federal agencies, the police, and prosecutors carry inherent biases with them. A good lawyer will investigate your case and find gaps in the evidence or mistakes in the investigation.  This attorney will raise these issues with the prosecutor in an effort to get the case or certain charges dismissed or to mitigate any potential punishment.

4. Help Yourself.

There are several things you can do to help your own case.  These often include submitting to a polygraph examination, collecting work and personal letters of reference and recommendation,  cooperating with your attorney and assisting the attorney in the investigation of your case, submitting to a psychological evaluation or sex-offender evaluation, participating in treatment including participation in a 12-Step program for sexual addiction, sexual compulsion or Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)  and cooperate with the attorney in any effort to obtain a forensic examination of your computer hard drive (which should be done in virtually every case).  There are many potential defenses that can arise from the forensic examination of the computer, but it takes a highly skilled and savvy attorney to make sure this procedure is thorough and precise.
If you are in this situation or need help with a case like this, you should call us immediately  
To recap, you should do the following:
  • Don't talk to the law enforcement investigator other than to deny the allegations.  Tell the investigator, ” I am requesting to speak to a lawyer” and deny any request to conduct a search of any person, place or thing;
  • Immediately contact and retain the services of a highly experienced and skilled attorney, whether an investigation is anticipated, has just begun or charges have already been filed;
  • Seek professional help, including psychological counseling or participation in a 12-Step program, where needed or appropriate.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Do You Think Sex Criminals Ought To Be Allowed On Facebook?

When someone is caught, charged and prosecuted as a sex offender, they lose a great many rights they once had. Depending on the state, they have to register themselves as an offender, alert their neighbors and even keep a safe distance from any public place where children congregate. It’s likely a majority of Americans feel that these restrictions are warranted and even wise, but now some sex offenders are fighting against rulings that ban them from using social networking sites, such as Facebook. Claiming free speech rights, these sex offenders are challenging the rulings that prevent them from using certain sites and services on the internet: Sites and services which could allow them an avenue to commit the same crimes all over again. For their part, Facebook and LinkedIn have gone on record by altering their policies to show their support of these kinds of bans against sex offenders. According to the Chicago Tribune, several sex offenders in Indiana, Nebraska and Louisiana have been able to successfully challenge these rulings, arguing that the use of social networking and other online discussions is a part of their human rights to free speech. Many authorities are in support of the bans, saying they are necessary to keep children safe from these predators when they are online. Often, these children can be online without their parent’s knowledge, making the restrictions all the more important. In Indiana, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is heading the fight on behalf of a man who has served a 3 year sentence for child exploitation, as well as other registered sex offenders who are out on probation but are still affected by the ban. Thursday, Judge Tanya Walton Pratt of the Indianapolis U.S. District Court questioned attorneys about sex criminals’ rights, and whether denying them access to Facebook and other sites like it infringe on their free speech. Attorney for the ACLU Ken Falk argued the 4-year old law was meant to protect children, but instead it is stopping these registered sex criminals from expressing their political and religious views on websites which allow you to leave comments via your Facebook login. According to the Associated Press, Falk believes this law violates the rights of communication, which the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled is guaranteed by the First Amendment. Falk also argued that the ban is unnecessary in the state of Indiana, saying there is already another law which makes using the internet to contact a child for sexual purposes a crime. Indiana Deputy Attorney General David Arthur argued that the 2008 ban is limited to social networking sites, and therefore doesn’t stop a sexual criminal from communicating with a child in some other way. “We still have television. We still have radios. And believe it or not, people still talk face-to-face,” he said. Arthur also said the ban doesn’t extend to email or message boards. “It’s not enough to say that the plaintiffs can still write letters or go to meetings,” Falk said, claiming it’s unfair to insist the criminals not be allowed the privilege of online communication. “These are not adequate alternatives for instant communication.”

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Federal Sencing Commission Garners Reversal of Crack Cocaine Federal Sentencing Desparity, Robert Paisola Reports

Yesterday, the U.S. Sentencing Commission held its hearing on whether and how to make the new crack guideline retroactive. It was a jam-packed and exciting day. Here is my quick recap:

Dozens of FAMM members attended the hearing, traveling from as far away as Indiana, Michigan, New Hampshire and North Carolina. FAMM's president, Julie Stewart, told the commissioners, that the mere presence of so many family members was more powerful than anything the witnesses could possibly say.

But happily, witness after witness called for retroactivity, starting with the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder. While he also called for restrictions on who might benefit, we hope that the Commission will listen to the many, many others who testified that retroactivity should be available for everyone, not just some. Judging from the tough questions Commissioners asked the Department of Justice witness who testified with the Attorney General, we are cautiously optimistic that they will listen more to the Department's support for retroactivity and less to the Department's call for restrictions on who should be eligible for retroactivity.

You can read Julie's written statement here and to FAMM member Natasha Darrington's excellent testimony here. Natasha did an amazing job delivering her testimony, bringing some of the commissioners and audience to tears. And when Julie asked the FAMM members with loved ones in prison to stand and be recognized, it was clear the commissioners were visibly moved. FAMM plays a powerful role in reminding policy makers who their policies impact. (Expect an email from us soon with video and pictures from the hearing.)

Media coverage of the hearing was limited but excellent. The New York Times interviewed Julie in a piece that appears here. National Public Radio (NPR) interviewed Julie and Natasha for a segment that aired this morning on Morning Edition found here. Natasha appeared on another NPR show, Tell Me More, found here. FAMM was also quoted in an Associated Press print story and radio clip in advance of the hearing.

Finally, I want you to know that even those of you who couldn't attend the hearing had an impact. The Commission mentioned that it had received over 34,000 letters in support of retroactivity. THANK YOU for taking the time to make your voices heard by sending in letters and signing our petition!

So, what's next? The Commission will hold a vote on retroactivity sometime this summer. We will be back in touch to let you know what we're doing to make sure the vote comes out right.

It was an exciting day and your support helped make it so. Thank you so much!



Jennifer Seltzer Stitt
Federal Legislative Affairs Director

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Unnecessary Death At The Orlando Florida Airport, Robert Paisola Reports for NBC

Death At The Orlando International Airport, Robert Paisola Reports LIVE for JetBlue AYCJ

Death at the Orlando Airport. 

Watch the videos to Come. We walked out of the terminal and this man fell off of a bus. EVERYONE simply stood there and did NOTHING... FOR 22 Minutes. I could not just watch this. I had To do SOMETHING! Watch the 3 videos and then lets see what YOU would do ... HE LAID THERE FOR 22 MINUTES. NOBODY DID A THING, BUT WATCHED. I turned it into a teaching moment to show my daughter how valuable Firefighters are.. Discretion is Advised in Watching these 3 Videos.
Robert Paisola
Western Capital Multimedia USA
Copyright Robert Paisola 2010


Florida Keys






Fort Myers/ Naples Metro Area

Florida Keys

Ft Lauderdale / Miami Metro Area

West Palm Beach / Ft Pierce Metro Area

Orlando Metro Area

Tampa Bay Metro Area

Gainesville Metro Area

Jacksonville Metro Area

Tallahassee Metro Area

Panama City Metro Area

Pensacola Metro Area



Florida Keys






Saturday, July 3, 2010

Taking Back Our Country: A 4th of July Message from Robert Paisola

Subject: Independence Day and 1,331 member's and counting!

Hello my fellow group members,

My name is Robert Paisola and I created the group Sky Las Vegas and Taking back America. Our group has swelled to over 130,000 members. Thank you all for sending out invitations and being members of this group. I know that I always say this, but you stand as a voice for the unspoken majority in this country that believes in our traditional Christian values that built this country. With that in mind I wanted to share some thoughts on the meaning of the holiday we will be celebrating this weekend.

On July 4th, America's independence will be celebrated in grand fashion with parades, fireworks and backyard BBQs. Did you know that this year (2010), Americans will commemorate the 234th anniversary of the approval of the Declaration of Independence by the Continental Congress, the act that set the 13 American colonies on their road to national sovereignty?

Take a moment to watch this video that we have produced in association with our friends at The Free Capitalist Project and Founders University. This is an amazing historical image of what it takes to truly be free as Americans.

When enjoying this weekend’s festivities, have fun and be safe, but take a moment to remind yourself and your family what this day represents. This day stands in history as the day a group of our countries forefathers declared their freedom; freedom from tyranny, religious persecution and taxation without representation. That freedom has reigned on and continues to thrive after 234 years. Remember to think of all the blood, sweat and toil that has been sacrificed for us to be able to enjoy this weekend and when you can, say a prayer for our troops still in harm’s way that are still protecting our freedom to this day.

Please be safe this weekend. God bless you all and God bless America!


Robert Paisola
The Western Capital Foundation
"Taking back America"

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Trial Against San Diego Appraisal Firm To Commence Tomorrow, Mustafa v Anderson Appraisal Services Inc, Robert Paisola Reports Live



June 02, 2010 
Copyright Robert Paisola for Western Capital Multimedia Inc. All Rights Reserved:

Anderson Appraisal Services, The Trial for Fraud Begins in San Diego, California, Robert Paisola reports Live for WCM and Bloomberg Financial

On June 03, 2010, the case of Al Mustafa v Crane et al will commence in the Superior Court of California - County of San Diego against ANDERSON APPRAISAL SERVICES INC for fraud.

We attempted to contact the President of Anderson Appraisals, Kevin Allin, for comment on this case, however we did not receive a reply before our publication deadline.

We contacted the Plaintiff in this case, and spoke to Mr. Al Mustafa, who stated that " This case is about an appraisal company that was nothing but a criminal enterprise. They would stop at nothing to make money and thereby conducted their business in an illegal manner in order to continue to keep doing business, even though they knew that they were unable to fulfill the orders that they were receiving". Mustafa stated that principals of the company, Mark McDaniel, Richard McDaniel and Kevin Allin were all involved in what is known as a Criminal Conspiracy. (We will be posting the full court depositions on Credit In America for the media.

Mustafa further stated that the following individuals at Anderson Appraisal Services Inc knew that the appraisals that they were delivering to their clients were false and caused irreparable harm to thousands of California Residents.

The individuals involved are as follows:

Kevin Allin, SRA
Vice President, Principal
SRA Designated Member of the Appraisal Institute
ERC Affiliate Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1990
Began Appraisal Career: 1990

Mark McDaniel
President, Principal
Associate Member American Society of Appraisers
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1990
Began Appraisal Career: 1990

Richard McDaniel
Vice President, Principal
Associate Member NAIFA
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1992
Began Appraisal Career: 1992

John McGuiness
Senior Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1995
Began Appraisal Career: 1990

Gary DeBruin
Senior Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1992
Began Appraisal Career: 1987

Jack Meredith
Senior Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1990
Began Appraisal Career: 1990

Jamie Davidson
Staff Appraiser
Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1998
Began Appraisal Career: 1997

Mike Swenson
Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 2001
Began Appraisal Career: 2001

Robert Long
Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 2002
Began Appraisal Career: 2002

Scott Hemsley
Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 2003
Began Appraisal Career:2003

Danielle Ross
Office Manager
Joined Firm: 1997


Michelle Potter
Appraisal Support/Analyst
Joined Firm: 1997

Stephanie Phillips
Appraisal Support/Analyst
Joined Firm: 2003

Mustafa stated that he will stop at nothing, to ensure that ANDERSON APPRAISAL SERVICES INC is shut down in San Diego and surrounding areas where they provide services in California, and that the principals listed above are criminaly indicted by a federal grand jury.

Court records indicate that jury selection for this matter begins tomorrow.

We will be live on the scene in San Diego and will be posting all of the court documents on this matter. We will also bring you live comments from the United States Attorney in San Diego, who is also following this matter closely.

In conclusion Mustafa said, "How is it possible for one appraisal company with only two licensed appraisers to complete over 1400 appraisals in one month" *from Court Deposition

That is the question that the US ATTORNEY in California wants answered also, said Mustafa.

For our readers, this is the case information now on file regarding this matter.

Case Number: GIC871195 Case Location: San Diego
Case Type: Civil Date Filed: 08/22/2006
Category: CU-FRD Fraud

Last Name or Business Name First Name Primary (P)

Last Name or Business Name First Name Primary (P)