The Robert Paisola Foundation Salt Lake County Jail Booking Live Feed

Loading...

The Robert Paisola Live World News Feed

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Unnecessary Death At The Orlando Florida Airport, Robert Paisola Reports for NBC


Death At The Orlando International Airport, Robert Paisola Reports LIVE for JetBlue AYCJ



Death at the Orlando Airport. 







Watch the videos to Come. We walked out of the terminal and this man fell off of a bus. EVERYONE simply stood there and did NOTHING... FOR 22 Minutes. I could not just watch this. I had To do SOMETHING! Watch the 3 videos and then lets see what YOU would do ... HE LAID THERE FOR 22 MINUTES. NOBODY DID A THING, BUT WATCHED. I turned it into a teaching moment to show my daughter how valuable Firefighters are.. Discretion is Advised in Watching these 3 Videos.
Robert Paisola
Western Capital Multimedia USA
Copyright Robert Paisola 2010
877-517-9555



































Southwest

Florida Keys

Central-east

Central

Central-west

Northeast

Northwest


Fort Myers/ Naples Metro Area

Florida Keys

Ft Lauderdale / Miami Metro Area

West Palm Beach / Ft Pierce Metro Area

Orlando Metro Area

Tampa Bay Metro Area

Gainesville Metro Area

Jacksonville Metro Area

Tallahassee Metro Area

Panama City Metro Area

Pensacola Metro Area





Southeast

Southwest

Florida Keys

Central

Central-east

Central-west

Northeast

Northwest
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, August 1, 2010

President Rosevelt Presents a Second Bill of Rights: Is NOW the time? Ro...

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Taking Back Our Country: A 4th of July Message from Robert Paisola



Subject: Independence Day and 1,331 member's and counting!

Hello my fellow group members,

My name is Robert Paisola and I created the group Sky Las Vegas and Taking back America. Our group has swelled to over 130,000 members. Thank you all for sending out invitations and being members of this group. I know that I always say this, but you stand as a voice for the unspoken majority in this country that believes in our traditional Christian values that built this country. With that in mind I wanted to share some thoughts on the meaning of the holiday we will be celebrating this weekend.

On July 4th, America's independence will be celebrated in grand fashion with parades, fireworks and backyard BBQs. Did you know that this year (2010), Americans will commemorate the 234th anniversary of the approval of the Declaration of Independence by the Continental Congress, the act that set the 13 American colonies on their road to national sovereignty?

Take a moment to watch this video that we have produced in association with our friends at The Free Capitalist Project and Founders University. This is an amazing historical image of what it takes to truly be free as Americans.





When enjoying this weekend’s festivities, have fun and be safe, but take a moment to remind yourself and your family what this day represents. This day stands in history as the day a group of our countries forefathers declared their freedom; freedom from tyranny, religious persecution and taxation without representation. That freedom has reigned on and continues to thrive after 234 years. Remember to think of all the blood, sweat and toil that has been sacrificed for us to be able to enjoy this weekend and when you can, say a prayer for our troops still in harm’s way that are still protecting our freedom to this day.

Please be safe this weekend. God bless you all and God bless America!

Regards,

Robert Paisola
CEO
The Western Capital Foundation
"Taking back America"
http://www.RobertPaisola.com
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Trial Against San Diego Appraisal Firm To Commence Tomorrow, Mustafa v Anderson Appraisal Services Inc, Robert Paisola Reports Live





ATTENTION CALIFORNIA RESIDENTS:




SINCE THIS STORY BROKE, WE HAVE RECEIVED OVER 500 CALLS FROM CLIENTS OF THIS COMPANY WHO ARE TELLING US THAT THEY HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BECAUSE OF KEVIN ALLIN AND ANDERSON APPRAISALS. IF YOU ARE A VICTIM OF THIS COMPANY, PLEASE SEND THE DETAILS OF YOUR SITUATION WITH CONTACT INFORMATION TO CLASS.ACTION.@WESTERNCAPITALMULTIMEDIA.COM AND ON OF OUR ANALYSTS WILL GET BACK WITH YOU. PLEASE DO NOT CALL OUR OFFICES IN LOS ANGELES, NYC, UTAH, LAS VEGAS OR MIAMI, AS THIS IS NOW AN ISSUE THAT IS BEING HANDLED BY OUR SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM IN NEW YORK IN ASSOCIATION WITH BLOOMBERG FINANCIAL.  WE HAVE RECEIVED VERIFICATION FROM THE COURT THAT WE WILL HAVE AUDIO COPIES OF THE DEPOSITIONS THAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR THAT SHOW THE CLEAR CHAIN OF COMMAND IN WHICH THIS FRAUD WAS COMMITTED. WE WILL BE POSTING ALL OF THE DATA FROM THE TRIAL ON A DAILY BASIS.  IF YOU ARE AN EMPLOYEE OF ANDERSON APPRAISALS IN CALIFORNIA, AND HAVE INFORMATION TO SHARE, YOUR CONFIDENTIALITY IS ASSURED.




June 02, 2010 
Copyright Robert Paisola for Western Capital Multimedia Inc. All Rights Reserved:




Anderson Appraisal Services, The Trial for Fraud Begins in San Diego, California, Robert Paisola reports Live for WCM and Bloomberg Financial


On June 03, 2010, the case of Al Mustafa v Crane et al will commence in the Superior Court of California - County of San Diego against ANDERSON APPRAISAL SERVICES INC for fraud.

We attempted to contact the President of Anderson Appraisals, Kevin Allin, for comment on this case, however we did not receive a reply before our publication deadline.

We contacted the Plaintiff in this case, and spoke to Mr. Al Mustafa, who stated that " This case is about an appraisal company that was nothing but a criminal enterprise. They would stop at nothing to make money and thereby conducted their business in an illegal manner in order to continue to keep doing business, even though they knew that they were unable to fulfill the orders that they were receiving". Mustafa stated that principals of the company, Mark McDaniel, Richard McDaniel and Kevin Allin were all involved in what is known as a Criminal Conspiracy. (We will be posting the full court depositions on Credit In America for the media.

Mustafa further stated that the following individuals at Anderson Appraisal Services Inc knew that the appraisals that they were delivering to their clients were false and caused irreparable harm to thousands of California Residents.

The individuals involved are as follows:

Kevin Allin, SRA
Vice President, Principal
SRA Designated Member of the Appraisal Institute
ERC Affiliate Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1990
Began Appraisal Career: 1990

____
Mark McDaniel
President, Principal
Associate Member American Society of Appraisers
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1990
Began Appraisal Career: 1990
____

Richard McDaniel
Vice President, Principal
Associate Member NAIFA
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1992
Began Appraisal Career: 1992

____
John McGuiness
Senior Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1995
Began Appraisal Career: 1990

____
Gary DeBruin
Senior Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1992
Began Appraisal Career: 1987

____
Jack Meredith
Senior Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1990
Began Appraisal Career: 1990

____
Jamie Davidson
Staff Appraiser
Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 1998
Began Appraisal Career: 1997

____
Mike Swenson
Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 2001
Began Appraisal Career: 2001

____
Robert Long
Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 2002
Began Appraisal Career: 2002

____
Scott Hemsley
Staff Appraiser
Certified Real Estate Appraiser
Joined Firm: 2003
Began Appraisal Career:2003

____
Danielle Ross
Office Manager
Joined Firm: 1997

____

Michelle Potter
Appraisal Support/Analyst
Joined Firm: 1997

____
Stephanie Phillips
Appraisal Support/Analyst
Joined Firm: 2003
____

Mustafa stated that he will stop at nothing, to ensure that ANDERSON APPRAISAL SERVICES INC is shut down in San Diego and surrounding areas where they provide services in California, and that the principals listed above are criminaly indicted by a federal grand jury.

Court records indicate that jury selection for this matter begins tomorrow.

We will be live on the scene in San Diego and will be posting all of the court documents on this matter. We will also bring you live comments from the United States Attorney in San Diego, who is also following this matter closely.

In conclusion Mustafa said, "How is it possible for one appraisal company with only two licensed appraisers to complete over 1400 appraisals in one month" *from Court Deposition

That is the question that the US ATTORNEY in California wants answered also, said Mustafa.

For our readers, this is the case information now on file regarding this matter.

Case Title: MUSTAFA VS CRANE
Case Number: GIC871195 Case Location: San Diego
Case Type: Civil Date Filed: 08/22/2006
Category: CU-FRD Fraud

Plaintiff/Petitioner
Last Name or Business Name First Name Primary (P)
MUSTAFA AUF AL P

Defendant/Respondent
Last Name or Business Name First Name Primary (P)
ANDERSON APPRAISAL SERVICES INC
COWLES TAMMIE, TAMMY COWLES
CRANE GENNY D, GENNY D CRANE
CRANE MYLENDE L, MELENDE L CRANE
DAVIES MELODY, MELODY DAVIES
HENDERSON BRAD, BRADLEY HENDERSON
LOANSHOPPERS INC, LOANSHOPPERS INC.
OAK HILL MORTGAGE INC, OAK HILL MORTGAGE
RABARA CYNTHIA C, CYNTHIA RABARA
WMC MORTGAGE INC
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Las Vegas Immigration Protest Shuts Down Strip, America Under Seige Robe...

Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

http://connect2utah.com/news-story/?nxd_id=89275

http://connect2utah.com/news-story/?nxd_id=89275
Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Court Describes Federal Sentencing Disparities as “A Picture of Injustice” Robert Paisola Reports

Court Describes Federal Sentencing Disparities as “A Picture of Injustice”


In 1984 the United States Congress enacted the Sentencing Reform Act (“SRA”), and as part of the Act, Congress created the United States Sentencing Commission (“Commission”) to “establish sentencing policies and practices for the Federal criminal justice system.” 1/ The Commission was charged with the responsibility of creating U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) that would assist Federal judges in the sentencing process to fulfill Congress’ five purposes for imposing criminal sentences. 2/

Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(a)(2) lists the five congressionally-mandated purposes for sentencing:

•To reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense;
•To afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct;
•To protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and
•To provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner.
While the Guidelines and the § 3553(a) factors were intended to eliminate the gross disparities in federal sentencing practices before the SRA, they have failed miserably in many significant respects, particularly in child pornography cases. Since the enactment of the SRA, Congress has repeatedly created new offenses, increased penalties, and issued directives to the Commission concerning child pornography offenses. 3/ The following is a list of many of the laws enacted by Congress over the last three decades regarding child pornography-related offenses:

•Protection of Children Against Exploitation Act of 1978;
•Child Protection Act of 1984;
•Child Sexual Abuse and Pornography Act of 1986;
•Child Abuse Victims’ Rights Act of 1986;
•Child Protection Restoration and Penalties Enhancement Act of 1990;
•Sex Crimes Against Children Prevention Act of 1995;
•Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998;
•Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003;
•PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008;
•Providing Resources, Officers, and Technology to Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2008;
•Keep the Internet Devoid of Sexual Predators Act of 2008; and
•Effective Child Pornography Prosecution Act of 2008.

This endless stream of legislation has contributed to an increasing, and more open, judicial chaos in the specific area of child pornography sentencing. This chaos was highlighted in the case of Jeremy Goldberg who pled guilty in March 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to a single count of possession of child pornography. U.S. District Court Judge Joan B. Gottschal sentenced Goldberg to one day in prison, credit for time served, and ten years of supervised release. 4/ The Government appealed the sentence as unreasonably lenient, and in June 2007 the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, remanding Goldberg’s case back to Judge Gottschal for resentencing. 5/ On remand, Judge Gottschal sentenced Goldberg to 48 months of imprisonment, recommended that he be placed in a Sex Offender Treatment Program operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and imposed ten years of post-release supervision. 6/

But Judge Gottschal did not shy away from the Seventh Circuit’s remand order. She pointed out in her sentencing memorandum on remand that she had explained the original sentence as best she could, and added that a fair reading of her explanation was not “consistent with the Seventh Circuit’s assessment of it.” She noted that the appeals court not only quarreled with the way she had justified Goldberg’s original sentence but quarreled with the sentence itself. 7/ The judge cited the following portion of the Seventh Circuit’s ruling to support her position:

“A prison sentence of one day for a crime that Congress and the American public consider grave, in circumstances that enhance the gravity (we refer to the character of some of the images), committed by a convicted drug offender does not give due weight to the ‘nature and circumstances of the offense,’ ‘promote respect for the law,’ or ‘provide just punishment for the offense.’ It does not ‘afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct.’ And it creates an unwarranted sentence disparity, since similarly situated defendants are punished with substantial prison sentences.” 8/

Perhaps it was the Seventh Circuit’s reference to “sentence disparity” that prompted Judge Gottschal to call out the appeals court. Over an 18-month period Jeremy Goldberg downloaded from the Internet hundreds of images of children—some as young as 2 or 3—engaged in sex acts with adults. He offered these images to other subscribers of a web site in an effort to procure similar images from these subscribers. And he would masturbate while viewing the child pornography. 9/ Judge Gottschal in some detail examined sentences imposes in what she called “comparable cases in its sister courts.” 10/ As noted by Judge Cottschal, the following cases illustrate the disparity in the way similar child pornography cases are charged and sentence:

•Kirkham v. United States, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31046 (D. Utah 2008): child pornography case involving 5,129 images given a 120-month sentence where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 135-168 months.
•United States v. Sudyka, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42569 (D. Neb. 2008): child pornography case involving 3000 images given a 24-month sentence where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 63-78 months.
•United States v. Baird, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2338 (D. Neb. 2008): child pornography case involving 800 images given a 24-month sentence where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 46-57 months.
•United States v. McElheney, 524 F.Supp.2d 983 (E.D.Tenn. 2007): child pornography case involving 200 images given 135-month sentence where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 135-168 months.
•United States v. Thomas, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15937 (N.D. Ill. 2008): child pornography case involving 200 images given 84-month sentence where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 168-210 months.
Judge Gottschall then pointed to the sentence disparities found among the federal circuits:

•United States v. Perez, 484 F.3d 735 (5th Cir. 2007): sentence of 57-months upheld in child pornography case involving thousands of images stored on 4000 compact discs.
•United States v. Kirchhof, 505 F.3d 409 (6th Cir. 2007): sentence of 180 months upheld in child pornography case involving 992 images where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 210-262 months.
•United States v. Grinbergs, 470 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006): sentence of 12 months and a day reversed in child pornography case involving 348 images where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 46-47 months.
•United States v. Kerr, 472 F.3d 517 (8th Cir. 2006): sentence of 151 months upheld in child pornography case involving 45-50 images (some sadomasochistic).
•United States v. Meiners, 485 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2007): sentence of 180 months (statutory mandatory minimum) upheld in child pornography case involving 10,000-12,000 images (some sadomasochistic).
•United States v. McBride, 511 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2007): sentence of 84 months upheld in child pornography case involving 981 images where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 151-188 months.
Judge Gottschal did not stop with the sentencing disparities found in other federal circuits in child pornography cases. She pointed to blatant disparities in such cases found in the Seventh Circuit itself:

•United States v. Lowe, 516 F.3d 580 (7th Cir. 2008): sentence of 144 months upheld in child pornography case involving 6500 images.
•United States v. Shrake, 515 F.3d 743 (7th Cir. 2008): sentence of 330 months in child pornography case involving 600 images where Guidelines recommended a sentence range of 292-365 months.
•United States v. Baker, 445 F.3d 987 (7th Cir. 2006): sentence of 87 months upheld in child pornography case involving 300 images where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 108-135 months.
•United States v. Barevich, 445 F.3d 956 (7th Cir. 2006): sentence of 76 months upheld in child pornography case involving 8178 images where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 87 to 108 months.
•United States v. Wachowiak, 496 F.3d 744 (7th Cir. 2007): sentence of 70 months upheld in child pornography case involving more than 600 images (some sadomasochistic) where Guidelines recommended sentence range of 121-151 months.
These cases reflect there is no real rhyme or reason to the actual sentences imposed in child pornography cases or in the Guidelines that govern such sentences. This point was made clear by Judge Kathleen M. O’Malley in the case of Evan M. Stern who pled guilty to possession of child pornography in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The Guidelines recommended a sentence range of 46 to 57 months. Judge O’Malley, who rarely ever deviates from the recommended Guidelines sentence range and who has a history of imposing harsh sentences in child pornography cases, imposed a sentence of 12 months and 1 day of incarceration on Stern. 11/ Citing the Jeremy Goldberg decision, Judge O’Malley made these observations about sentencing disparity in child pornography cases:

“This Court has carefully considered an extremely wide variety of opinions from across the country as well as the National Guidelines Statistics … The Court is deeply troubled by its findings: ‘anyone seriously concerned about federal sentencing disparities [must begin by] taking a very close look at federal child porn cases.’ Professor Douglas A. Berman, Is there an Ivy-Leaguer Exception to Federal Child Porn Charges? (October 22, 2008) … Based on the Court’s review of the case law, it is clear that ‘one would be hard pressed to find a consistent set of principles to explain exactly why some federal porn defendants face decades in federal prison, some face many years in federal prison, while others only end up facing months.’ Id. This Court is ‘struck by the inconsistency in the way apparently similar cases are charged and sentenced.’

“In short, the national sentencing landscape presents a picture of injustice. In the absence of coherent and defensible Guidelines, district courts are left without a meaningful baseline from which they can apply sentencing principles. The resulting vacuum has created a sentencing procedure that sometimes can appear to reflect the policy views of a given court rather than the application of a coherent set of principles to an individual situation. Individual criminal sentences are not the proper forum for an expansive dialogue about the principles of criminal justice. Such conversation, though vital, should not take place here—lives are altered each and every time a district court issues a sentence: this is not a theoretical exercise. Yet, this Court is mindful of the appropriate scope of its authority—it must take the law as it finds it.” 12/

Congress has created the law the way Judge O’Malley finds it—a “picture of injustice.” While we agree with Judge Gottschal that “no two cases are identical and reported cases may not describe all [the] salient facts,” the cases cited by Judge Gottschal and those which influenced Judge O’Malley’s “picture of injustice” conclusion clearly demonstrate there are serious problems in the federal sentencing process, especially in child pornography cases. It is fundamentally unjust to punish criminal defendants differently for committing essentially the same offense. Unexplainable and significant sentencing disparities are repugnant to our notions of justice.

We strongly suggest that Congress quit pandering to the “law and order” agenda and enact legislation that will bring about a more uniform federal sentence process which was in the original intent of the SRA.

SOURCES:

1/ “The History of Child Pornography Guidelines,” The United States Sentencing Commission, (October 2009). Full report at: http://www.ussc.gov/general/20091030_History_Child_Pornography_Guidelines.pdf
2/ Id., at p. 1
3/ Id.
4/ United States v. Goldberg, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35723 (N.D. Ill. April 30, 2008)
5/ United States v. Goldberg, 491 F.3d 668 (7th Cir. 2007)
6/ United States v. Goldberg, supra, Lexis at 1
7/ Id., Lexis at 2
8/ United States v. Goldberg, supra, 491 F.3d at 671-72
9/ Id., at 670
10/ United States v. Goldberg, supra, Lexis at 5
11/ United States v. Stern, 590 F.Supp.2d 940 (N.D. Ohio 2008)
12/ Id., 590 F.Supp. at 961
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)